Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-27996636-20180225211948/@comment-28063230-20180306182355

Liammclovein wrote: did you just have a conversation with yourself? It was an example, I edited it to make it more clear. Ancapride wrote: Guys... Guys... Guys.... Let's all just agree that the order of quality clearly goes Dragonball>DBZ>DBS>GT.... Am I right? It depends, DBGT showed better development in characters than DBS, better villain designs, better transformation, and it's an actual continuation unlike the latter.

Pikkoro died, and he wasn't wished back, #18 actually helped defeating a main villain, Vegeta grew as a person shown clearly by how he not only was willing to fuse without making a fuss, he presented the idea himself, the series brought 3 main villain arcs in 64 episodes, DBS brought 2 main villain arcs in 131, and one of them was a repeated story.

The idea of the arcs have WAY more potential than DBS, but executed laughably, the search for the Dragon Balls in space was a great idea to get Goku away from Earth, and letting the remaining characters to fend for themselves, but they didn't go far with it because the 1st time the Earth was in danger everyone failed.

The Super #17 arc had the opportunity to bring characters like Frieza without bending the Dragon Balls rules, and to brought back all enemies so that new faces defeated them, example: Gotenks Vs Cell.

The Shadow Dragons arc had THE most potential ever, and they waste it almost as worst as they could, it was perfect to have the whole cast in, example: Tenshinhan, Kuririn, Roshi, Buu & Uub could've faced 2-Star, #17 & #18 could've faced 5-Star, Gotenks Vs 6-Star, Vegeta Vs 7-Star, Gohan Vs 3-Star, Goku Vs 4-Star, Gogeta Vs 1-Star.