Thread:CakeBuu/@comment-33272261-20180630022534

Hey Cake, this is just an idea I came up with and wondered if you would support.

So after arguing with MrMixtape about the Full Power Tier List, and checking what the different ranks mean, I believe we need a revamp. The current system is:
 * S Tier is for the units at the top of their class. They are excellent additions and in some cases, optimal. This includes practically all of the leader units for that type and/or Category.
 * A Tier is the tier right below. Units in this rank are nice additions to their respective teams, and will generally assist in the building of a good team. They may suffer from a few drawbacks but are otherwise solid.
 * B Tier is for filler units. They suffer from several things which prevent them from ascending higher but can be used until better units are obtained.
 * C Tier is for units that suffer many drawbacks and lack a place on their team, and are only usable if you have no one else.
 * D Tier is for units who severely under-perform even as fillers and will rarely find a place in your team.
 * F Tier is for cards with no redeeming qualities and should not be used.
 * Honorable Mentions Tier is not necessarily worse than F Tier. It is reserved for cards that have some useful mechanic or specific use for some situations. They are not staple units. Alternatively, it is for cards that don't fit the type/Category of that list but are capable of subbing onto that team, sometimes better than cards that are of that type/Category. They benefit from the inferior secondary leader skill of the ideal leader.

I believe, since Tier Lists are supposed to rank how well a unit performs on a team objectively, that it should go something like:


 * S Tier is for units that are optimal on said team. There should only be 6 of them, and they represent what the absolute best team would look like.
 * A Tier is for units that are extremely good on the team, but aren't optimal. They are still amazing, but they aren't the best of the best.
 * B Tier is for units that are decently good, but have flaws that make them worse than A Tier.
 * C Tier is for units that have obvious flaws/only serve as filler/are simply outclassed by B Tier.
 * D Tier doesn't really need any change
 * F Tier doesn't really need any change
 * Honorable Mentions Tier doesn't really need any change

What are your thoughts? Just kind of curious, since I think that the system now is a little soft and isn't really a Tier List as much as it is: Well these guys are good, these guys are less good, these guys suck, these guys suck more, etc... 