Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-33033861-20170920162409/@comment-33075390-20170925052635

Your* This is true for a baseline of ruels however, that is ignoring the true reality of dialects. You see if you remove the abstrations that the rules are based off of you find that in real life no 2 people define something 100% the same as the connotation says use and then as such makes it so that people often push their rules on others. This has been the case with Y'all in current history. You see Y'all is proper english, just not current ruling class english. I say current because orginally they did view it as the proper contration of you and all, then the common class started using it and the elitist of the upper class decieded it was no longer suitable for use. This happens often as the ruling class wish for something in the langue it self to show their supperiorty over the lower class, and its from here the "Rules" you say stem from. Now since these rules change when ever those in power feel like it, I say the rules are then unjust, and should only be used as a basic outline with clear marks to show that depending on origin of the speaker will differ greatly. And since these rules do lose value if you hold them in this light atempting to correct someone on their langue based off the rules we learned in school, and by proxie the ruling class's rules, we then subject them to needless concern and self doubt. So as such by atempting to enforce these rules with out flexiblity and then claiming supperiorty to me from it you continue a harmful spiral of belittlement.