Talk:Tier List: Androids/test/@comment-31661832-20200109221615/@comment-31661832-20200109224131

Thanks! I think it really comes down to the core of what the tier lists are for, seeing which units are good on which teams.

Right now it's too focused on which individual cards are good. That example paragraph sells me on the fact that Android 13 is a great overall card, but it's not about him as a card overall, it's how he functions on this particular team. The bullet points are so much easier as far as seeing why I would/wouldn't want to run him on this team, without needing to parse through an entire block of text to find it.

The reason I think the current descriptions panned out this way is because "does a lot of damage" is the primary reason most units get high rankings, but a lot of times that damage is independent of what team the card is on. If it's really necessary to compare damage outputs for ranking reasons, maybe we can put something like "damage averaging 1.4 million under dual 170% lead" as a bullet point, rather than specifically saying he gets an unconditional 130%. For his SA that has a stun chance, it'd be a bullet point like "One of the few characters on this team with a stun chance on SA", highlighting that it's important for the team in some way instead of just general info.