Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-36780658-20181205161030/@comment-13712594-20181207140545

DBS did few things wrong yes but compared to GT >.>. Sorry to say GT did so much wrong. For me it felt like a massive filler, extremely bad pacing, uninteresting characters, only goku, so many revenge plots -_-  bad villains, Kid goku, pan, that ending -_- etc.

While I liked SS4 but how to obtain is completely stupid. Also it has a massive weakness. Tail gone is no SS4.

I am sorry to say but in my eyes GT did everything wrong and most characters were forgetable. (Guy with whips was cool and nuovo shenron)

DBS had a bad start, they got rushed and that came at a great cost. Bad animation. Luckily it had only 1 revenge plot. Sadly the writing wasn't that good. It had great idea's but turned out meh. RIBRIANNE,  Also what I find annoying was the power differences. Just plain stupid most of the time (the manga makes it up for the most part until VB (after that the manga went crap))

What did DBS good? It used some characters ideas from gt (whip guy = hit) other set of dragon balls. BEERUS!! Goku black, Jiren, Vegeta (manga did/does it better) SSG, SSB (manga) UI. TOP, more saiyans, Female SS,Zeno and the angels,  Golden Frieza, better expanded universes.

So which one do I find better? While both have their bad writing I can only judge it by if I can rewatch it again. Sadly this is where gt completely fails for me. I tried rewatching it few times but I always stop rewatching it because it's just sooooo boring.

Keep in mind that this my opinion ;)